Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Ivan Gakhov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zandschulp vs Gakhov analysis and find out who is favored!
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Ivan Gakhov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 49.39% of points on his second serve, while Gakhov has won 46.5%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 49.42% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gakhov has won 50%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.71% and 30.17% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 60.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gakhov has saved 64.08% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 48.15% of matches played (W/L 26/ 28), with Gakhov winning 40% (W/L 20/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 87/ 45), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 10/ 11). Gakhov has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 403/ 232), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 39.13% of matches (W/L 9/ 14), where as Gakhov has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.74% of matches (W/L 17/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zandschulp winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 2 and Gakhov winning 1. The last match between Zandschulp and Gakhov was at the BMW Open - Munich, 16-04-2024, First, Clay with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 6-4 2-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:42:16.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Gakhov have played a deciding set 1 times, with Zandschulp winning 1 times and Gakhov 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 0, and Gakhov 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 170.2 while Gakhov has played against players with an average rank of 274.38.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 69% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gakhov has won 31% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 37.5% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gakhov has converted 45% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 0 Gakhov
112
Rank
22
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
274
Rank
142
High
27
Age
L
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
63% (332-196)
Career Total W/L
61% (465-297)
44% (12-15)
YTD W/L
38% (9-15)
$2,900,825
Career Prize Money
$56,825
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zandschulp VS Gakhov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Ivan Gakhov |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:42:16 | 2:42:16 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (48/93) | 52% (57/110) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (29/48) | 58% (33/57) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (21/45) | 42% (22/53) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (6/21) | 40% (6/15) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (55/110) | 46% (43/93) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Zandschulp VS Gakhov H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 2-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Ivan Gakhov
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
110)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Botic Van De Zandschulp | Ivan Gakhov |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (12/15) | 38% (9/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (26/34) | 44% (24/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (286/309) | 49% (271/277) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 33% (1/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 54% (7/6) | 40% (8/12) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.41 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 119 | 111 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0.32 |
| DFs Total | 80 | 87 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:33 | 1:51:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 174.26 | 248.42 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1186/1887) | 59% (1061/1812) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (816/1186) | 69% (736/1061) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (342/701) | 47% (352/751) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (64/169) | 46% (67/147) |
| Return Pts W% | 38% (720/1891) | 39% (683/1769) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (5/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 42% (5/7) | 50% (2/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 37% (7/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 48% (12/25) | 39% (9/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (7/14) | 13% (1/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 25% (2/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 82% (11/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 18% (11/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 7% (15/1) | 0% (13/0) |
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Quentin Halys
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
59)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
66%
(
87 of
132)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
58%
(
26 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
44 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
121)
129
Total Points Won
124
|
7-5 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Zachary Svajda
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Rinderknech
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
57%
(
57 of
100)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
29 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
24 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Christopher Eubanks
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan-Lennard Struff
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
56%
(
42 of
75)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
105)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
46 of
74)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
105)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Ivan Gakhov
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
110)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Ivan Gakhov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Ivan Gakhov
59%
(
58 of
99)
1st Serve %
56%
(
59 of
105)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
37%
(
15 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
44 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
105)
98
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(7) 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hugo Dellien
Player
Ivan Gakhov
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Marco Cecchinato
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
72%
(
73 of
102)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
31 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
102)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Ivan Gakhov
52%
(
48 of
93)
1st Serve %
52%
(
57 of
110)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
43 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
55 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Henri Squire
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
74%
(
43 of
58)
7
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Alexander Weis
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Ivan Gakhov
47%
(
27 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Ivan Gakhov
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve %
57%
(
65 of
114)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
114)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
60)
4
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
1
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Ivan Gakhov
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Zandschulp Vs Gakhov Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Botic Van De Zandschulp
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
